From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: SCSI core patches for kernel 3.12 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:17:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20131002161758.GA1516@infradead.org> References: <52135B99.2000102@acm.org> <20131002074006.GA8994@infradead.org> <1380726918.2081.43.camel@dabdike> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:44303 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753434Ab3JBQTG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:19:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1380726918.2081.43.camel@dabdike> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche , Mike Christie , Hannes Reinecke , David Milburn , linux-scsi On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:15:20PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > And I thought the world was ending when Linus started top posting ... I think it's quite usual style if you ask a bytestander to comment on a whole mail - there's not specific context to quote in that case. > You mean apart from the fact that it's a long series which seems to self > confess to providing not much value and therefore not rating itself high > on the review list? It seem generally useful, and has been out for over a month. For any reasonable maintained subsystem even a patch at the end of the review list should have gotten a comment from the maintainer at this point, even if it's a "go away" in the worst case.