From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Is there any plan to support 64bit lun in mainline? Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:29:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20131014152950.GA6625@infradead.org> References: <525BC836.2030306@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:41541 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239Ab3JNP36 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:29:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525BC836.2030306@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "Wangshen (C)" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Jinbo (Justin)" On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:32:22PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > However, there are two other patchsets pending (EH Deadline and > asynchronous command aborts), both of which have been tested > thoroughly _and_ have acked-by from various other parties. > None of these patchset had received any feedback from James > Bottomley, let alone any indication if or when they'll be merged. > > So I stopped sending further patchsets, sensing some communication > breakdown on the line. Maybe we'll need to start a common scsi staging tree for all patches that have gotten a wide amount of reviews and are interesting to many parties. Thay way we have one common set of patches for the distributions to pull from, and a tree to develop against where dependencies between the patchsets exist.