From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matias Bjorling <m@bjorling.me>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] blk-mq: support for shared tags
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:01:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403180143.GA23473@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D9017.4070609@bjorling.me>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Matias Bjorling wrote:
> > I'd still create a request_queue for the internal queue, just not register
> > a block device for it. For example SCSI sets up queues for each LUN
> > found, but only a subset actually is exposed as a block device.
> >
>
> Ok. That is good enough for now. A little heavy on the overhead side, if
> only the tag logic is needed.
>
> What about the following suggestions for shared tags:
>
> 1. Rename it from blk_mq_shared_tags to blk_mq_tag_group. A driver can
> have several tag groups that it maintains.
I was going to rename it to tag_set, but tag_group sounds fine to me as well.
> 2. Instead of blk_mq_shared_tags structure in blk_mq_reg. Have function
> pointer for getting the tags structure during hctx initialization. This
> is interesting for nvme, because it has as set of tags for each hardware
> queue it exposes.
The current code also has an array of blk_mq_tags structures, one for
each queue. Do you need a more complicated mapping than that?
Btw, I was also going to siply split out the tag allocation from the
queue registration unconditionally. While this adds a little more
boilerplate to simple drivers it avoids unconditional code pathes and should
make the model much easier to understand. I should have a new version
of the patches soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 14:46 [RFC] blk-mq: support for shared tags Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-31 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk->mq: stop pre-initializing req->special Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-31 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: initialize request on allocation Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-31 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: move request structures into struct blk_mq_tags Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-09 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2014-04-10 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-11 2:42 ` Jens Axboe
2014-04-11 7:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-11 13:56 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-31 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: support shared tag maps Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-02 0:16 ` [RFC] blk-mq: support for shared tags Matias Bjorling
2014-04-02 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-03 4:10 ` Matias Bjorling
2014-04-03 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-03 16:45 ` Matias Bjorling
2014-04-03 18:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-04-03 21:47 ` Matias Bjorling
2014-04-04 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140403180143.GA23473@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bjorling.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).