From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:39:28 -0700
Message-ID: <20140520053928.GA1751@infradead.org>
References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org>
 <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:03:43AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Is this a request for inclusion of those branches into linux-next
> separately from the scsi tree itself?

James said he wants to include it in the scsi tree, but given how late
we are in the cycle I'd love to see separate exposure until that happens
on a temporary basis.