From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib: replace ambiguous "Unhandled error code" messages. Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 04:00:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20140528110018.GA30751@infradead.org> References: <1401099204-18050-1-git-send-email-mlombard@redhat.com> <20140526162506.GB18319@infradead.org> <20140526192715.GA2271@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:44331 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751941AbaE1LAS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 07:00:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140526192715.GA2271@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Maurizio Lombardi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:27:15PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote: > > How about simple not setting description at all for this case? > > > > It has already been proposed before but James didn't like the idea. > > http://markmail.org/message/dumujpz4gfp3s4fp#query:+page:1+mid:dumujpz4gfp3s4fp+state:results James never replied to Robs question. I can't think of any value add that "Unhandled XYZ" adds when we already get a usesul message from the same error. James, care to comment what'd you like to see printed here?