From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:03:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20140528160358.GA8782@infradead.org> References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au> <20140520053928.GA1751@infradead.org> <20140521094636.515289e8@canb.auug.org.au> <1400639101.2481.19.camel@dabdike> <20140528105429.GA20549@infradead.org> <5386084A.6030003@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5386084A.6030003@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sujit Reddy Thumma Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:31:14PM +0530, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: > The above 4 patches are just posted to mailing lists with no > review/ack's yet. I believe it still went in because the sender has > modified the author name to himself and signed-off by is present by the > original author which worked as a positive review for your rules. I > have asked the sender to check why the original author name is changed. > Meanwhile, I believe these patches should get some more time for review. Yes, I did count this as a positive review for now. I can drop the patches for now.