From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "hch@infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] be2iscsi: Fix processing cqe for cxn whose endpoint is freed Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:33:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20140602193349.GA11555@infradead.org> References: <1399340492-2136-1-git-send-email-jkallickal@emulex.com> <1399340492-2136-7-git-send-email-jkallickal@emulex.com> <536AB13E.6080906@cs.wisc.edu> <0eb11761-3b46-44d0-b35a-16d121fe1df4@CMEXHTCAS2.ad.emulex.com> <20140602064601.GA6630@infradead.org> <1401736926.12939.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:32780 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752426AbaFBTdz (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:33:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1401736926.12939.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "MinhDuc.Tran@Emulex.Com" , "jayamohank@gmail.com" , "michaelc@cs.wisc.edu" , "Sony.John-N@Emulex.Com" , "Jayamohan.Kallickal@Emulex.Com" On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:22:07PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > Actually, can you really pull it out, not just revert it? Reverts cause > problems with bisection and are unnecessary before the tree goes to > Linus. > > If preserving history becomes a real goal, we'd have to move to a tip > like model, but I'm happy coping with the rebase that dropping a patch > from a monolithic tree causes. Linus has been very unappy about rebasing close to or in the merge window, and other subsystems generally revert patches that late in the cycle as well. I'd prefer to stick to that model, but if you and Linus prefer the rebase now I can do it as well of course.