From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:31:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20140611143128.GA30904@infradead.org> References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> <20140611120143.GA26071@infradead.org> <1402496254.2523.3.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1402496254.2523.3.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Rothwell , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:17:34AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > No, I was waiting to check if there was any reason to have them split, > but I think we've scope today or tomorrow. > > The only other outstanding thing is the fsync bug fix, which is waiting > Jens' investigation of the block issues it may cause, but I'm inclined > to send it anyway and fix up block later if there's a problem. There's various fixes marked for stable from Paolos virtio_scsi update, which he asked to be considered for 3.16, including a core one: [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi_error: fix invalid setting of host byte also [PATCH] sd: bad return code of init_sd seems like another candidate for 3.16.