From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] block: Add a disk flag to block integrity profile Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 03:24:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20140625102441.GA24735@infradead.org> References: <1401334128-15499-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <1401334128-15499-9-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <20140611164858.GC9511@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:55388 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752942AbaFYKYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:24:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , axboe@fb.com, nab@daterainc.com, sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 09:30:34PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > /sys/block/foo/integrity/disk_is_formatted_with_pi > /sys/block/foo/integrity/disk_is_integrity_capable > /sys/block/foo/integrity/disk_supports_storing_pi > > Or would you prefer something other than disk? target? storage_device? I'd defintively prefer the target_ prefix and one of the descriptive suffixes.