From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Haber <steven@qumulo.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: SCSI eats error from flush failure during hot plug
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:13:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140625131344.GA13094@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403201159.17294.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:05:59AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> That's not really a good idea either ... I did think of it. We'll end
> up with a cmd_type of REQ_TYPE_FS which because of REQ_FLUSH (or REQ_FUA
> or REQ_DISCARD or any number of other things) we have to treat as though
> it were REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC. It's much better to tune handling
> expectations according to req->cmd_type because that's what we already
> do. These commands are actually set up by our handlers, so it's up to
> us to mark the request type correctly.
Looking at the places where the SCSI midlayer cares about the request
type:
- scsi_finish_command to call ->done for non-PC requests. Given that
we called into the driver to setup flush/discard/etc we should also
call into the driver on request completion
- scsi_eh_action: ditto for error handling
- scsi_noretry_cmd: I don't see why we'd want to treat flush request
as having an implicit failfast flag
- scsi_io_completion: this mostly opts out of all kinds of error
handling and retries, not really what we'd want either
- scsi_unprep_fn: calls ->uninit_command only for !PC request,
so your patch introduces a leak for discard requests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 23:52 SCSI eats error from flush failure during hot plug Steven Haber
2014-06-07 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-09 17:21 ` Steven Haber
2014-06-09 17:29 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-11 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-19 18:05 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-25 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-06-26 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-26 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-26 15:04 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-26 15:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-26 18:52 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-27 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-26 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-26 18:13 ` Steven Haber
2014-06-26 18:52 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-27 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAPK7rjdpxAALA-oLZJ3wDBPc3kr5Nw4jLALLxEaT0zSiAOD+wg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-06-30 18:45 ` Steven Haber
2014-07-01 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-03 16:57 ` Steven Haber
2014-07-03 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-09 22:38 ` James Bottomley
2014-07-10 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-17 15:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140625131344.GA13094@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven@qumulo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox