From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fcoe: Reduce max_sectors to 1024 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:36:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20140710063630.GA13276@infradead.org> References: <1404886581-3218-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20140709061838.GA28335@infradead.org> <53BCE3DE.6000605@suse.de> <1404932313.12914.36.camel@vfc0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:46842 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750708AbaGJGgf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:36:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404932313.12914.36.camel@vfc0> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Vasu Dev Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, fcoe-devel@open-fcoe.org Hannes, can you respin the patch with a comment explaining the limit? > Does it limit IO size for pass through IO not through block layer ? The max_sectors limit also limits the size of passthrough requests.