From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: scsi-mq V2 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:14:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20140710161438.GA30792@infradead.org> References: <1403715121-1201-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20140708144829.GA5539@infradead.org> <53BD7041.5010300@interlog.com> <53BD9A24.7010203@kernel.dk> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B9628B@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140710062040.GB20146@infradead.org> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B96E3B@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140710160422.GA13728@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140710160422.GA13728@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" Cc: Jens Axboe , "dgilbert@interlog.com" , James Bottomley , Bart Van Assche , Benjamin LaHaise , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:04:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It's starting to look weird. I'll prepare another two bisect branches > around some MM changes, which seems the only other possible candidate. I've pushed out scsi-mq.3-bisect-3 and scsi-mq.3-bisect-4 for you.