From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFC: clean up command setup Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 02:16:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20140711091607.GA26912@infradead.org> References: <1404048881-19526-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:48314 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbaGKJQJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 05:16:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404048881-19526-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 03:34:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There has been some confusion because scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd is used to set > up various special TYPE_FS commands. I've looked into the area and come > up with various cleanup, as well as few small bug fixes that were turned > up by this. > > The series is against the core-for-3.17 branch of my scsi-queue tree. I'd like to drop the RFC and officially propose this for inclusion. As noted elsewhere this also helps as a preparation for handling the WRITE SAME and discard requests properly for scsi-mq, so I'd love to get some reviews for it, and will report scsi-mq on top of it.