From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: break from queue depth adjusting loops when device found Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:17:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20140726161721.GA6743@lst.de> References: <20140703150557.21608.37072.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> <20140703171106.GA16788@lst.de> <53B6878C.502@suse.de> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B86659@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140726153612.GA6513@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39524 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751434AbaGZQR3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:17:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Cameron Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" , Hannes Reinecke , "Stephen M. Cameron" , "james.bottomley@parallels.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Vasu Dev , Mike Christie On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:14:35AM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote: > Hmm, I forgot that that patch was in there, I wasn't trying to keep pushing > it along. From the previous discussion, I got the impression I was simply > wrong, and that this patch wasn't needed, so I had meant to drop it, I just > forgot to actually drop it. It's more complicated - as Robert indicated you're tenically right, although in practice it's not what the existing users expect. If you have some cycles for it I'd love to at lest get the per-LUN and per-target ramp up/down in ASAP. We can then start looking into doing it even better based on the target response later on.