From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] lpfc: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix() Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:02:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20140821170213.GA2296@infradead.org> References: <53F5D8DF.4060705@redhat.com> <53F5DEEF.4070406@redhat.com> <20140821165833.GA5853@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140821165833.GA5853@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Tomas Henzl , Christoph Hellwig , James Smart , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:58:34PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl > > Christoph, this patch was declined by James few times. > I think it needs his approval as well. You're referring to James Smart here, right? For an actively maintained driver like lpfc I'd like it be acked by the maintainer indeed. In fact for lpfc I have an agreement with James that he'll pick up lpfc patches and sent the colleted patches on to me.