From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] scsi: introduce sdev_prefix_printk()
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:43:03 -0700
Message-ID: <20140831214303.GD18839@infradead.org>
References: <1409247216-76074-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
 <1409247216-76074-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:42379 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751601AbaHaVnF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:43:05 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1409247216-76074-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Robert Elliot <elliot@hp.com>, Yoshihiro Yunomae <yoshihiro.ynomae.ez@hitachi.com>

Needs a bit more description in the patch body and preferable also
in a comment next to the macro.  What's the benefit of it over simply
using sdev_printk with another argument?