From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "hch@infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix miscellaneous issues Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:32:10 -0800 Message-ID: <20141230093210.GA6294@infradead.org> References: <1418764880-11183-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "ohering@suse.com" , "jbottomley@parallels.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:07:59PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > Should I be resending these patches. I don't need a resend, I need a review for the patches. Note that for driver patches I'm also fine with a review from a co worker, as long as it's a real review not just a rubber stamp. Talking about process: for the next submission please only use "storvsc: " as the subject prefix, I had to remove "Drivers: scsi: " which doesn'd add useful information every time so far.