From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:02:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20141230130230.GA28717@infradead.org> References: <20140708134003.GA7790@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140708134003.GA7790@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org It turnd out while the scsi-queue tree in general worked very well the split into core and drivers branches was rather cumbersome. For the 3.19 merge window updates and the 3.20 window I've switched to a single branch instead: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.19 git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.20 So far there 3.20 tree is still rather small, but there are a couple of series that need a resend or review and should go in. The rules from the original scsi-queue tree have worked well, so they still apply with a minor change. These rules are: - the patch needs at least two positive reviews (non-author signoff, reviewed-by or acked-by tags). In practice this means it had at least one and I added another one. As an exception I also take trivial and important fixes if they only have a Tested-by: instead of a second review. - the patch has no negative review on the mailing list - the patch applies cleanly - the patch compiles (drivers for architectures I can't test excluded) - for core the core branch: the patch survives a full xfstests run