linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.de, JBottomley@parallels.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool_alloc in atomic context
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:32:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105193213.GA31955@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AADF6A.6090100@kernel.dk>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:00:58PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That's not quite true, the only guarantee is that it WILL execute on the
> CPU (or CPUs) that are set in the mask. So unless it ends up offloading
> the run to a specific workqueue, we'll disable preempt in the current
> path before ->queue_rq() is called.

Oops.  Indeed, with those recent changes ->queue_rq can't safely block
for memory allocatios anymore.

The patch below should fix it:

---
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: scsi: ->queue_rq can't sleep

Since Linux 3.19 blk-mq may disable preemption before calling into
->queue_rq, so we can't actually sleep anymore.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 9ea95dd..6d5c0b8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -591,7 +591,6 @@ static void scsi_free_sgtable(struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb, bool mq)
 static int scsi_alloc_sgtable(struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb, int nents, bool mq)
 {
 	struct scatterlist *first_chunk = NULL;
-	gfp_t gfp_mask = mq ? GFP_NOIO : GFP_ATOMIC;
 	int ret;
 
 	BUG_ON(!nents);
@@ -606,7 +605,7 @@ static int scsi_alloc_sgtable(struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb, int nents, bool mq)
 	}
 
 	ret = __sg_alloc_table(&sdb->table, nents, SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS,
-			       first_chunk, gfp_mask, scsi_sg_alloc);
+			       first_chunk, GFP_ATOMIC, scsi_sg_alloc);
 	if (unlikely(ret))
 		scsi_free_sgtable(sdb, mq);
 	return ret;
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-31 18:14 scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool_alloc in atomic context Sasha Levin
2014-12-31 19:56 ` Douglas Gilbert
2015-01-05  9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-05 15:17   ` Sasha Levin
2015-01-05 19:00   ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-05 19:32     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-01-05 19:38       ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-05 19:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-08  3:55 Alexei Starovoitov
2015-01-08  9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-08 20:31 Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150105193213.GA31955@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).