From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Move user-shareable stuff in scsi/scsi.h to uapi/scsi/scsi.h Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:01:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20150109160140.GA29372@lst.de> References: <1420746479-25949-1-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com> <1420746479-25949-3-git-send-email-agrover@redhat.com> <20150109101422.GA23804@lst.de> <1420817266.2064.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150109154613.GA29124@lst.de> <1420818638.2064.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36816 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757721AbbAIQBn (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:01:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1420818638.2064.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andy Grover , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:50:38AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > Right, that's why I'm dubious about this effort. uapi files either have > to become the glibc headers or be exported in a way that allows > inclusion into glibc headers for there to be any point. uapi headers are not just for glibc, they are for any userspace application. Most of our uapi files aren't used by glibc at all.