From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: serialize ->rescan against ->remove
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:08:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130010849.GA4794@ad.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CABE29.5080909@redhat.com>
On Fri, 01/30 00:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 29/01/2015 00:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
> > concurrent calls to ->remove.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I wonder if this makes this problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/5/9 go
> away.
A quick test says yes.
Fam
>
> Paolo
>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > index 983aed1..523faee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> > @@ -1593,16 +1593,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_add_device);
> >
> > void scsi_rescan_device(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - if (!dev->driver)
> > - return;
> > -
> > - if (try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) {
> > + device_lock(dev);
> > + if (dev->driver && try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) {
> > struct scsi_driver *drv = to_scsi_driver(dev->driver);
> >
> > if (drv->rescan)
> > drv->rescan(dev);
> > module_put(dev->driver->owner);
> > }
> > + device_unlock(dev);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_rescan_device);
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 23:00 [PATCH 1/3] scsi: serialize ->rescan against ->remove Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-28 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] sd: don't grab a device references from driver methods Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-28 23:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: proper state checking and module refcount handling in scsi_device_get Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-29 14:46 ` James Bottomley
2015-01-29 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: serialize ->rescan against ->remove Alan Stern
2015-01-29 23:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-01-30 1:08 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-01-30 9:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-02 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-02 13:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-02 13:01 Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-05 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-05 13:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-16 17:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-05 13:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-10 16:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150130010849.GA4794@ad.nay.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).