From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ondrej Zary Subject: Re: RFC: should we deprecate unmaintained isa-only drivers? Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:52:53 +0100 Message-ID: <201503252152.53914.linux@rainbow-software.org> References: <20141230160616.GA29149@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-1.atlantis.sk ([92.240.247.91]:44801 "EHLO smtp-1.atlantis.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750809AbbCYVAG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:00:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141230160616.GA29149@infradead.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Zagorac , Dario Ballabio On Tuesday 30 December 2014 17:06:16 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We've got a few very old, isa-only SCSI HBA drivers in the tree. Of > those only one (aha152x) sas significant maintaince since the dawn > of git, all others only saw global / automatic updates. 4 of those > are fairly trivial wrappers aroudn the NCR538 core, so I don't mind > keeping them: > > - dtc > - g_NCR5380 > - pas16 > - t128 > > but I'd love to know if anyone is actually using the other drivers: > > - wd7000 > - aha1542 > - in2000 > - NCR53c406 > - sym53c416 > - u14-34f > - ultrastor NCR53c406a and sym53c416 look very similar. The register numbers and commands are almost the same so NCR53c406 support could probably be added to sym53c416 driver (looks better of the two) and NCR53c406a driver removed. Now I have cards with both chips so I'll try. -- Ondrej Zary