From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/18] megaraid_sas : Use Block layer tag support for internal command indexing Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:19:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20150512071936.GB16731@infradead.org> References: <201504231103.t3NB3e1u029800@palmhbs0.lsi.com> <20150511091805.GG28820@infradead.org> <5e1ce6ee219828a9d0d000be4836f973@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:33732 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752299AbbELHTh (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 03:19:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e1ce6ee219828a9d0d000be4836f973@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Sumit Saxena Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, thenzl@redhat.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, jbottomley@parallels.com, Kashyap Desai On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:27:19PM +0530, Sumit Saxena wrote: > Yes, it's not needed. I will remove this printk. If I resend only this > patch, then subsequent patches will be affected and needs to be recreated. > If you are Ok, then I can send a patch to remove this printk rebased on > top of this series. Sounds fine to me. With that the series look ok to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig