From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Merging se_dev_entry and se_lun? Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:58:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20150619135801.GA20951@infradead.org> References: <5583B957.20200@suse.de> <20150619065624.GA3601@infradead.org> <55841757.1090904@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:36579 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752879AbbFSN6D (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:58:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55841757.1090904@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Grover On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 03:21:27PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Each initiator has it's own dev entry. > > > But isn't 'se_lun' per initiator, too? No. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in