From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: rescan VPD attributes Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20150724144348.GA29080@lst.de> References: <1436353788-104911-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1436353788-104911-2-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20150724143834.GA28970@lst.de> <55B24E6A.6030904@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55815 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750976AbbGXOnt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:43:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B24E6A.6030904@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Bart van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ewan Milne On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:40:42PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Yeah, possibly. After all, the variable isn't expected to change > under rcu_read_lock(). Actually it can and will change, that's the point. But if you use a local variable you keep a single version of it, which won't be freed until after rcu_read_unlock.