From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] Add ida and idr helper routines. Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:49:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20150918154908.GA4065@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <915ec9ff5e9cc1fae0b36bf7d4c4cb115439e15d.1442263512.git.lduncan@suse.com> <20150915182755.GA31484@htj.duckdns.org> <1442342322.2177.13.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150915184157.GA495@htj.duckdns.org> <55FC30E2.8020000@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:35926 "EHLO mail-yk0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754141AbbIRPtM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:49:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55FC30E2.8020000@suse.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Duncan Cc: James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Johannes Thumshirn , Christoph Hellwig Hello, On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:42:26AM -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: > To be clear: you would like a patch series that converts the users of > the ida_* routines in my patches to instead use the ida_simple_* > routines, correct? And of course the ida_* helper routines I was adding > in idr.h would not be needed. Yeap. > If this is correct, I will supply a version 2 patch series that > addresses this issue as well as the two patch-naming issues that were > raised. Sounds good to me. If the shared lock blows up, we can make that per-ida. Thanks. -- tejun