From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@odin.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"??????(??????)" <chengmiao.cj@alibaba-inc.com>,
throber3 <throber3@gmail.com>,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ses: tighten range checks in ses_intf_add()
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:38:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020063820.GC1005@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151019134820.GA28752@mwanda>
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:48:20PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We test that "type_ptr" is within the buffer but then we read from
> "type_ptr[3]" so we could be reading beyond the end of the buffer.
>
> Reported-by: "Berry Cheng ??????(??????)" <chengmiao.cj@alibaba-inc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This isn't a complete fix because we still need more range checking in
> all the other places which use type_ptr like ses_get_page2_descriptor().
> We record len as page1_len but we don't use it anywhere...
>
> I wonder if someone knew the expected format we could make reject too
> short lengths earlier.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ses.c b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
> index dcb0d76..39f69b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ses.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static int ses_intf_add(struct device *cdev,
> /* begin at the enclosure descriptor */
> type_ptr = buf + 8;
> /* skip all the enclosure descriptors */
> - for (i = 0; i < num_enclosures && type_ptr < buf + len; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_enclosures && type_ptr + 4 < buf + len; i++) {
> types += type_ptr[2];
> type_ptr += type_ptr[3] + 4;
why "type_ptr + 4 < buf + len" here ? You're using type_ptr[3] only,
so it's either "type_ptr + 4 <= buf + len" or "type_ptr + 3 < buf + len".
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int ses_intf_add(struct device *cdev,
> ses_dev->page1_types = type_ptr;
> ses_dev->page1_num_types = types;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < types && type_ptr < buf + len; i++, type_ptr += 4) {
> + for (i = 0; i < types && type_ptr + 2 < buf + len; i++, type_ptr += 4) {
> if (type_ptr[0] == ENCLOSURE_COMPONENT_DEVICE ||
> type_ptr[0] == ENCLOSURE_COMPONENT_ARRAY_DEVICE)
> components += type_ptr[1];
Same here where I'd expect "type_ptr + 1 < buf + len"
Regards,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <----An------QYmAn$10b010ca-f710-44aa-8ea3-3b65a3c21286@alibaba-inc.com>
2015-10-19 13:48 ` [patch] ses: tighten range checks in ses_intf_add() Dan Carpenter
2015-10-20 6:38 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2015-11-05 21:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-05 22:01 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020063820.GC1005@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
--cc=chengmiao.cj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=throber3@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox