From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a bdi reregistration race, v2 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:23:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20151201072315.GA12183@infradead.org> References: <564F9AFF.3050605@sandisk.com> <20151124231331.GA25591@infradead.org> <5654F169.6070000@sandisk.com> <20151125084744.GA16429@infradead.org> <5655CCC0.9010107@sandisk.com> <565CF57A.4090507@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:55646 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbbLAHXX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 02:23:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565CF57A.4090507@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , Jan Kara , Hannes Reinecke , Aaro Koskinen , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:18:50PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Since the original patch caused a regression, please proceed with reverting > the original patch. > > Regarding this patch: is there anyone on the CC-list of this e-mail who can > review it ? I'm not too fond of the approach. I'd much prefer if SCSI would just release the dev_t later, similar to DM or MD.