* [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy"
@ 2015-12-16 23:12 James Smart
2015-12-17 8:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-17 22:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2015-12-16 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
The mempool_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
index 3fa6533..4fb3581 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
@@ -231,15 +231,13 @@ lpfc_mem_free(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
if (phba->lpfc_hbq_pool)
pci_pool_destroy(phba->lpfc_hbq_pool);
phba->lpfc_hbq_pool = NULL;
-
- if (phba->rrq_pool)
- mempool_destroy(phba->rrq_pool);
+ mempool_destroy(phba->rrq_pool);
phba->rrq_pool = NULL;
/* Free NLP memory pool */
mempool_destroy(phba->nlp_mem_pool);
phba->nlp_mem_pool = NULL;
- if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4 && phba->active_rrq_pool) {
+ if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) {
mempool_destroy(phba->active_rrq_pool);
phba->active_rrq_pool = NULL;
}
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy"
2015-12-16 23:12 [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy" James Smart
@ 2015-12-17 8:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-17 22:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2015-12-17 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Smart, linux-scsi
On 12/17/2015 12:12 AM, James Smart wrote:
>
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> The mempool_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
> index 3fa6533..4fb3581 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c
> @@ -231,15 +231,13 @@ lpfc_mem_free(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> if (phba->lpfc_hbq_pool)
> pci_pool_destroy(phba->lpfc_hbq_pool);
> phba->lpfc_hbq_pool = NULL;
> -
> - if (phba->rrq_pool)
> - mempool_destroy(phba->rrq_pool);
> + mempool_destroy(phba->rrq_pool);
> phba->rrq_pool = NULL;
>
> /* Free NLP memory pool */
> mempool_destroy(phba->nlp_mem_pool);
> phba->nlp_mem_pool = NULL;
> - if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4 && phba->active_rrq_pool) {
> + if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) {
> mempool_destroy(phba->active_rrq_pool);
> phba->active_rrq_pool = NULL;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy"
2015-12-16 23:12 [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy" James Smart
2015-12-17 8:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
@ 2015-12-17 22:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Herbszt @ 2015-12-17 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Smart; +Cc: linux-scsi, Sebastian Herbszt
James Smart wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> The mempool_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-17 22:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-16 23:12 [PATCH 15/17] lpfc: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "mempool_destroy" James Smart
2015-12-17 8:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-17 22:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).