From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] add driver for DesignWare UFS Host Controller Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:44:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20160107094437.GA11038@infradead.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:57239 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775AbcAGJoi (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 04:44:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Joao Pinto , Yaniv Gardi , Gilad Broner , Subhash Jadavani , Akinobu Mita Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com > This driver patch includes a core driver and glue drivers for pci and platform > for the DesignWare UFS Host IP. Why doesn't this use the existing ufs core? The architecture looks completely backwards to me.