From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [mpt3sas driver 02/10] mpt3sas: Used IEEE SGL instead of MPI SGL while framing a SMP Passthrough request message. Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:16:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20160128091609.GA26956@infradead.org> References: <1453963027-19770-1-git-send-email-suganath-prabu.subramani@avagotech.com> <1453963027-19770-3-git-send-email-suganath-prabu.subramani@avagotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453963027-19770-3-git-send-email-suganath-prabu.subramani@avagotech.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Suganath prabu Subaramani Cc: JBottomley@Parallels.com, jejb@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Sathya.Prakash@avagotech.com, kashyap.desai@avagotech.com, krishnaraddi.mankani@avagotech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chaitra.basappa@avagotech.com, sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:06:59PM +0530, Suganath prabu Subaramani wrote: > From: Suganath prabu Subramani > > As driver was using MPI SGL while framing the SMP Passthrough request > message due to which firmware unable to post the Reply Data in the host > memory and timeout is observed for this SMP Passthrough request message > and so unable to perform phy disable operation. Does this also do the right thing for MPT2 HBAs?