From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
Bart van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 13/23] scsi_dh_alua: Use workqueue for RTPG
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:32:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202093209.GA1357@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453191727-3626-14-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
> static void release_port_group(struct kref *kref)
> {
> struct alua_port_group *pg;
>
> + synchronize_rcu();
> pg = container_of(kref, struct alua_port_group, kref);
> + if (pg->rtpg_sdev)
> + flush_delayed_work(&pg->rtpg_work);
> spin_lock(&port_group_lock);
> list_del(&pg->node);
> spin_unlock(&port_group_lock);
I don't think this is correct - we need a grace period after the
list_del to prevent new lookups. I suspect the right thing to do here
is to simply use kfree_rcu for the pg. This also avoids waiting for
whole grace periods for each deleted port_group, which might be rather
expensive.
> + /* Check for existing port group references */
> + spin_lock(&h->pg_lock);
> + if (h->pg) {
> + old_pg = pg;
> + if (h->pg != pg) {
> + /* port group has changed. Update to new port group */
> + old_pg = h->pg;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(h->pg, pg);
> + }
> + } else {
> + rcu_assign_pointer(h->pg, pg);
> + }
This looks confusing - pg is the structure we just allocated, so why
do we assign it to old_pg? It seems like the above could be written
similar and more clear as:
olg_pg = h->pg;
if (pg != old_pg)
rcu_assign_pointer(h->pg, pg);
> + if (!sdev) {
> + WARN_ON(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG ||
> + pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_STPG);
Please use two separate WARN_ONs here to know which one triggered from
the line in the kernel log.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-19 8:21 [PATCHv4 00/23] ALUA device handler update, part II Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 01/23] scsi_dh_alua: Pass buffer as function argument Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 02/23] scsi_dh_alua: separate out alua_stpg() Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 03/23] scsi_dh_alua: Make stpg synchronous Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 04/23] scsi_dh_alua: call alua_rtpg() if stpg fails Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 05/23] scsi_dh_alua: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags() Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 06/23] scsi_dh_alua: allocate RTPG buffer separately Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 07/23] scsi_dh_alua: Use separate alua_port_group structure Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 08/23] scsi_dh_alua: use unique device id Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 09/23] scsi_dh_alua: simplify alua_initialize() Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 10/23] revert commit a8e5a2d593cb ("[SCSI] scsi_dh_alua: ALUA handler attach should succeed while TPG is transitioning") Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 11/23] scsi_dh_alua: move optimize_stpg evaluation Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 12/23] scsi_dh_alua: remove 'rel_port' from alua_dh_data structure Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 13/23] scsi_dh_alua: Use workqueue for RTPG Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-02 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 14/23] scsi_dh_alua: Allow workqueue to run synchronously Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:21 ` [PATCHv4 15/23] scsi_dh_alua: Add new blacklist flag 'BLIST_SYNC_ALUA' Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-02 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 16/23] scsi_dh_alua: Recheck state on unit attention Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 17/23] scsi_dh_alua: update all port states Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 18/23] scsi_dh_alua: Send TEST UNIT READY to poll for transitioning Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 19/23] scsi_dh: add 'rescan' callback Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 20/23] scsi: Add 'access_state' attribute Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 21/23] scsi_dh_alua: use common definitions for ALUA state Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 22/23] scsi_dh_alua: update 'access_state' field Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-02 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-19 8:22 ` [PATCHv4 23/23] scsi_dh_alua: Update version to 2.0 Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-02 2:35 ` [PATCHv4 00/23] ALUA device handler update, part II Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160202093209.GA1357@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).