From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Herbszt Subject: Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: [PATCH] Separate target visibility from reaped state information Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:37:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20160203223738.00000af8@localhost> References: <568FE922.9090004@sandisk.com> <1453251809.2320.56.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20160131185455.00000ef7@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:53040 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755565AbcBCViJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:38:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: James Bottomley , Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Thumshirn , Dan Williams , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Sebastian Herbszt Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Herbszt writes: > > >> The only change from the current workflow is that the DEL transition > >> (now the reaped flag) is done before the spin lock is dropped which > >> would fix a tiny window for two threads both trying to remove the > >> same target, but there's nothing that could possibly fix an iterative > >> soft lockup caused by restarting the loop, which is what the > >> changelog says. > > Sebastian> James, Martin, what's the status of this patch? I still hit > Sebastian> the reported soft lockup on 4.5-rc1. > > And you have verified that Bart's patch applied on top of 4.5-rc1 still > fixes the lockup? (I know you tested a previous version) I did not (yet) - will do soon. Sebastian