From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: vpd pages are mandatory for SPC-2 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:42:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20160315074232.GA10944@lst.de> References: <1457703965-71028-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <56E7B9AA.3020302@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44896 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934114AbcCOHmf (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:42:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56E7B9AA.3020302@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > But it feels even sillier having to whitelist every > standards-conformant device here; I certainly was when I figured > that EMC Clariion won't work properly without this patch. > > And the idea was to mark off _misbehaving_ drives, not the other way > round. It's the idea, but it has to prove workable as well in the end. That being said I'd prefer to allow Hannes patch in and see what the fallout is.