From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 09/14] libata: fixup ZAC device disabling Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:43:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20160414154355.GC12583@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1460443678-57934-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1460443678-57934-10-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20160413180947.GF3676@htj.duckdns.org> <570F2F13.2040509@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <570F2F13.2040509@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Shaun Tancheff , Damien Le Moal , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:48:03AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 04/13/2016 08:09 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > >> libata device disabling is ... curious. So add the correct > >> definitions that we can disable ZAC devices properly. > > > > Fold into an earlier patch? > > > That earlier patch would be commit > 9162c6579bf90b3f5ddb7e3a6c6fa946c1b4cbeb > ("libata: Implement ATA_DEV_ZAC"), which got merged > in 2014 ... Ah, right you are. Thanks. -- tejun