From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 01:35:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20160426083516.GC364@infradead.org> References: <20160419085221.GA29087@gmail.com> <1461641851.2392.32.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <5249561.9VpAPLD61M@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5249561.9VpAPLD61M@wuerfel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , Josh Poimboeuf , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Denys Vlasenko , Thomas Graf , Peter Zijlstra , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , jamborm@gcc.gnu.org, Ingo Molnar , Himanshu Madhani , qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:22:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Agree, plus, as I've said before, we have 3-4 weeks before we go final, > > so we still have some time before a decision has to be made. It looks > > like the gcc people already have a patch for the compiler, so the > > distributions could just push that out through channels. > > I don't think we can realistically blacklist gcc-4.9.{0,1,2,3}, > gcc-5.{0,1,2,3}.* and gcc-6.0 and require everyone to upgrade to compilers > that have not been released yet in order to build a linux-4.6 kernel. Agreed. What about just removing the wrappers? They seem fairly pointless to start with.