From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the
 ISA Kconfig option
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 12:17:07 -0400
Message-ID: <20160501161707.GA1441@sophia>
References: <cover.1460379702.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <20160413072602.GA7629@gmail.com> <20160413121515.GA23870@sophia>
 <20160413143838.GD5867@gmail.com> <20160413144842.GA26005@sophia>
 <20160413151826.GA13959@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160413151826.GA13959@kroah.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might 
>> >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so.
>> >
>> >I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code:
>> >
>> >  Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>> >
>> >I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >	Ingo
>> 
>> Ah yes, in retrospect I should have made it clear that this was for
>> supporting hardware rather than simply code cleanup. That was an
>> oversight on my part not to have made it more explicit.
>> 
>> Introducing everything to the driver tree would be most convenient, thus
>> allowing me to quickly release my subsequent patches which will be
>> rebased on top of these.
>
>Ok, I can take these.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h

Forgive me for probing again; what is that status of this patchset? I'm
anxious to see them accepted to prevent the regression introduced by the
ISA_BUS configuration option from appearing in the next merge window.

Many thanks,

William Breathitt Gray