From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: do not fail for unknown VPD identification Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:34:47 +1000 Message-ID: <20160509033447.GA12515@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1462523675-63172-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:52640 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbcEIDhw (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2016 23:37:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1462523675-63172-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:34:35AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Not every device will return a useable VPD identification, but > still might support ALUA. Rather then disable ALUA support we > should be allowing the device identification to be empty and > attach individual ALUA device handler to each devices. > > Reported-by: Paul Mackerras > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke Tested-by: Paul Mackerras