From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lpfc: support for CPU phys_id and core_id on PowerPC64 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:29:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20160621142902.GA10597@infradead.org> References: <1464813809-22066-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <201606012043.u51KflcX004680@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:42902 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752429AbcFUO3C (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:29:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201606012043.u51KflcX004680@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com, james.smart@broadcom.com I really don't think this sort of low level information has business in a low level driver. I've been trying to put some infrastructure together to move this to the core kernel [1], and it would be good to help use this in more drivers. Especially given that lpfc may use blk-mq which will not respect this current assignment for the queue mapping. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-June/005012.html