From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:42:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20161027124258.GD13200@lst.de> References: <5143c240-39af-9fe2-d3e6-ed69f9c20531@sandisk.com> <7690b469-f5b7-ab04-4b6f-fa0d679e0f18@acm.org> <16074653-5e31-27b0-90db-33d36a9df0bc@acm.org> <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55831 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965022AbcJ0OBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:01:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8404f2d1-5bc3-6c84-7ca0-24e7672ff67d@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , Mike Snitzer , Doug Ledford , Keith Busch , Laurence Oberman , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:05:14PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > I'll leave it to Jens to decide whether I should repost the patch series > with this change integrated or whether to realize this change with a > follow-up patch. I would prefer to get the series in now. I think we should eventually the stop queues call, the quience call and even the cancellation of the requeues into a single function, but it's not as urgent. I think this series actually is Linux 4.9 material.