From: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vmw_pvscsi: return SUCCESS for successful command aborts
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:27:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161028162726.GA1270@rage> (raw)
The vmw_pvscsi driver reports most successful aborts as FAILED to the scsi
error handler. This is do to a misunderstanding of how completion_done() works
and its interaction with a successful wait using wait_for_completion_timeout().
The vmw_pvscsi driver is expecting completion_done() to always return true if
complete() has been called on the completion structure. But completion_done()
returns true after complete() has been called only if no function like
wait_for_completion_timeout() has seen the completion and cleared it as part of
successfully waiting for the completion.
Instead of using completion_done(), vmw_pvscsi should just use the return
value from wait_for_completion_timeout() to know if the wait timed out or not.
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
---
vmw_pvscsi.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
@@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static int pvscsi_abort(struct scsi_cmnd
unsigned long flags;
int result = SUCCESS;
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(abort_cmp);
+ int done;
scmd_printk(KERN_DEBUG, cmd, "task abort on host %u, %p\n",
adapter->host->host_no, cmd);
@@ -824,10 +825,10 @@ static int pvscsi_abort(struct scsi_cmnd
pvscsi_abort_cmd(adapter, ctx);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->hw_lock, flags);
/* Wait for 2 secs for the completion. */
- wait_for_completion_timeout(&abort_cmp, msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
+ done = wait_for_completion_timeout(&abort_cmp, msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->hw_lock, flags);
- if (!completion_done(&abort_cmp)) {
+ if (!done) {
/*
* Failed to abort the command, unmark the fact that it
* was requested to be aborted.
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 16:27 David Jeffery [this message]
2016-10-28 17:05 ` [PATCH] vmw_pvscsi: return SUCCESS for successful command aborts Laurence Oberman
2016-10-28 17:24 ` Ewan D. Milne
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-31 22:04 Jim Gill
2016-11-01 13:54 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161028162726.GA1270@rage \
--to=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox