From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:17:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20161103151751.GD7404@infradead.org> References: <20161014073821.qvkpjtwraqnwzzs3@linux-x5ow.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:58956 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758086AbcKCPRy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:17:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161014073821.qvkpjtwraqnwzzs3@linux-x5ow.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Steffen Maier , "Martin K . Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , Linux SCSI Mailinglist , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Anil Gurumurthy , Sudarsana Kalluru , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Tyrel Datwyler , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Johannes Thumshirn , James Smart , Dic On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=147637177902937&w=2 > > Hi Steffen, > > Can you please try the following on top of 2/16? How does this fit into the patch we're replying to?