linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mq queue stall during command requeue
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:12:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119151238.GA32178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31a4a94c-5cd7-ef45-7103-c61a0d60ab46@kernel.dk>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:58:09AM -0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Yeah, I made that patch and grepped the tree. The usage in the fc
> code in nvme looks weird. It's stopping all potential hardware queues,
> yet only delaying one.
> 
> if (op->rq) {                                                   
>         blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(op->rq->q);                       
>         blk_mq_delay_queue(queue->hctx, NVMEFC_QUEUE_DELAY);    
> }                                                               
> return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY;
> 
> James/Christoph, what's going on there? I'm going to leave that one
> as-is for now, but add the stop to the delay. If the above stop-all is
> indeed buggy, then it can later just be removed.

It looks broken to me, but I'll need James to confirm.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 14:17 [PATCH] scsi: mq queue stall during command requeue Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-19 14:52   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19 14:58     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-19 15:12       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-19 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-20  7:24   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119151238.GA32178@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jth@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).