linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mchristi@redhat.com" <mchristi@redhat.com>,
	"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI core: Fix WRITE SAME handling
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:24:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126082453.GA11768@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485384261.2646.8.camel@sandisk.com>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:44:41PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 11:37 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Fixes: f80de881d8df ("sd: remove __data_len hack for WRITE SAME")
> > 
> > I think the better fix is to simply revert this commit.
> 
> Hello Christoph,
> 
> Do you mean reverting commit f80de881d8df only for kernel release v4.10
> or also for future releases? How about resubmitting a reworked version of
> commit f80de881d8df for kernel v4.11?

Let's revert it for good for now.  This was a braino for me as the
real write same requests are very different from discards implemented
as write same.  I have a WIP series that would change a lot in this
area, so additional churn before that would not be productive.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-25  1:21 [PATCH] SCSI core: Fix WRITE SAME handling Bart Van Assche
2017-01-25 10:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25 22:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-26  8:24     ` hch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126082453.GA11768@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).