From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "hch@lst.de" Subject: Re: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request V2 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:59:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20170126185924.GA25289@lst.de> References: <1485365126-23210-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1485455329.2540.7.camel@sandisk.com> <1485456745.2540.9.camel@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Bart Van Assche , "hch@lst.de" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "snitzer@redhat.com" , "j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > It's against my for-4.11/block, which you were running under Christoph's > patches. Maybe he's using an older version? In any case, should be > pretty trivial for you to hand apply. Just ensure that .flags is set to > 0 for the common cases, and inherit 'flags' when it is passed in. No, the flush op cleanups you asked for last round create a conflict with your patch. They should be trivial to fix, though.