public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi/sd: release scan_mutex during sync_cache and start_stop
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:02:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170208210258.GA8957@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170208204240.4002411-1-songliubraving@fb.com>

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:42:40PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> When a device is deleted through sysfs handle "delete", the code
> locks shost->scan_mutex. If multiple devices are deleted at the
> same time, these deletes will be handled in series.
> 
> On the other hand, sd_shutdown() sometimes issues long latency
> commands: sync cache and start_stop. It is not necessary for these
> commands to run in series.
> 
> To reduce latency of parallel "delete" requests, this patch unlock
> shost->scan_mutex before long latency commands and relock the mutex
> after the command.
> 
> Fixed bug from previous version.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 9e0783b..22add77 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -3304,6 +3304,9 @@ static int sd_start_stop_device(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, int start)
>  static void sd_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev;
> +	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
> +	bool scan_mutex_locked;
>  
>  	if (!sdkp)
>  		return;         /* this can happen */
> @@ -3311,14 +3314,26 @@ static void sd_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
>  		return;
>  
> +	sdev = sdkp->device;
> +	shost = sdev->host;
> +	scan_mutex_locked = mutex_is_locked(&shost->scan_mutex);

The use of mutex_is_locked outside of asserts is always bogus.

The fix you want is most like in the caller of the method.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-08 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08 20:42 [PATCH v2] scsi/sd: release scan_mutex during sync_cache and start_stop Song Liu
2017-02-08 21:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-02-08 21:15   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170208210258.GA8957@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox