From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 10/10] mpt3sas: lockless command submission for scsi-mq
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:03:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221150349.GA28150@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77d6469d-1e96-3136-2753-2dcf1aed989c@suse.de>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:58:08PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> + if (ioc->shost->use_blk_mq) {
> >> + u32 unique_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >> +
> >> + tag = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_tag(unique_tag);
> >> + } else
> >> + tag = scmd->request->tag;
> >
> > All that unique_tag stuff is only required for SCSI LLDDs that
> > set nr_hw_queues > 1, which isn't the ase with this patch.
> >
> Abstraction.
> I would not presume anything about SCSI-MQ/block-mq here; calling
> blk_mq_unique_tag() insulates me against any changes blk-mq might be
> doing for the tag allocation or management.
cmd->request->tag has the same meaning with blk-mq or not, so this
check is obviously wrong.
> >> + ioc->shost->reserved_cmds = INTERNAL_SCSIIO_CMDS_COUNT;
> >
> > Why? You're never calling the block layer to allocate a reserved
> > request.
> >
> The idea was to have a stub command for any ioctl passthrough commands,
> so they'll show up when traversing the list of active commands (hence it
> always uses 'scsiio_depth' and not 'can_queue').
Sure. But setting reserved_cmds has nothing to do with that - it only
sets requests aside so they can be allocated using BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED.
If you reserve tags for purely driver internal usage without a struct
request just don't advertise them to the block layer at all. This
is what we do in hpsa, and that's what mpt3sas should do as well.
> >> + if (ioc->shost->use_blk_mq)
> >> + smid = 1;
> >> + else
> >> + smid = ioc->scsiio_depth - ioc->shost->reserved_cmds;
> >
> > Huh? Explanation, please.
> >
> When enabling reserved tags with blk-mq the reserved tag range is at the
> start of the tagspace; for legacy sq there is no reserved range, but
> 'can_queue' is reduced by the number of reserved commands, effectively
> locating the reserved tag range at the end of the tag space.
internal tag number are a blk-mq implementation detail, and drivers
should not second guess it. As said above - just don't use the
reserved_cmds field and set the smids aside inside mpt3sas.
> Figuring out if there are still pending commands on the given target.
starget->target_busy
> Figuring out if there are pending commands on that LUN.
sdev->device_busy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 12:26 [PATCHv3 00/10] mpt3sas: Full mq support, part 1 Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 01/10] mpt3sas: switch to pci_alloc_irq_vectors Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-22 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-22 9:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-23 0:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-23 8:19 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 02/10] mpt3sas: set default value for cb_idx Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 03/10] mpt3sas: use 'list_splice_init()' Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 04/10] mpt3sas: separate out _base_recovery_check() Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 05/10] mpt3sas: open-code _scsih_scsi_lookup_get() Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 06/10] mpt3sas: Introduce mpt3sas_get_st_from_smid() Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 07/10] mpt3sas: check command status before attempting abort Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-22 8:17 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 08/10] scsi: allocate reserved commands Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 09/10] mpt3sas: always use first reserved smid for ioctl passthrough Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 14:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 12:27 ` [PATCHv3 10/10] mpt3sas: lockless command submission for scsi-mq Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 14:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 14:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-21 15:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170221150349.GA28150@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox