* [bug report] scsi: lpfc: NVME Initiator: Merge into FC discovery
@ 2017-02-27 16:34 Dan Carpenter
2017-03-04 17:48 ` James Smart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-02-27 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jsmart2021; +Cc: linux-scsi
Hello James Smart,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch a0f2d3ef374f: "scsi: lpfc: NVME Initiator: Merge into FC
discovery" from Feb 12, 2017, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c:943 lpfc_cmpl_ct_cmd_gft_id()
error: we previously assumed 'ndlp' could be null (see line 928)
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
927 ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(vport, did);
928 if (ndlp) {
^^^^
Check.
929 /* The bitmask value for FCP and NVME FCP types is
930 * the same because they are 32 bits distant from
931 * each other in word0 and word0.
932 */
933 if (fc4_data_0 & LPFC_FC4_TYPE_BITMASK)
934 ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_FCP;
935 if (fc4_data_1 & LPFC_FC4_TYPE_BITMASK)
936 ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_NVME;
937 lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_ERR, LOG_DISCOVERY,
938 "3064 Setting ndlp %p, DID x%06x with "
939 "FC4 x%08x, Data: x%08x x%08x\n",
940 ndlp, did, ndlp->nlp_fc4_type,
941 FC_TYPE_FCP, FC_TYPE_NVME);
942 }
943 ndlp->nlp_prev_state = NLP_STE_REG_LOGIN_ISSUE;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not checked.
944 lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp, NLP_STE_PRLI_ISSUE);
945 lpfc_issue_els_prli(vport, ndlp, 0);
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c:1694 lpfc_nvmet_unsol_issue_abort()
error: we previously assumed 'ndlp' could be null (see line 1690)
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
1688
1689 ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(phba->pport, sid);
1690 if (!ndlp || !NLP_CHK_NODE_ACT(ndlp) ||
^^^^^
Check.
1691 ((ndlp->nlp_state != NLP_STE_UNMAPPED_NODE) &&
1692 (ndlp->nlp_state != NLP_STE_MAPPED_NODE))) {
1693 atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
1694 lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_NVME_ABTS,
1695 "6134 Drop ABTS - wrong NDLP state x%x.\n",
1696 ndlp->nlp_state);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Potential Oops.
1697
1698 /* No failure to an ABTS request. */
1699 return 0;
1700 }
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c:1792 lpfc_nvmet_sol_fcp_issue_abort()
error: we previously assumed 'ndlp' could be null (see line 1788)
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
1786
1787 ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(phba->pport, sid);
1788 if (!ndlp || !NLP_CHK_NODE_ACT(ndlp) ||
^^^^^
Check.
1789 ((ndlp->nlp_state != NLP_STE_UNMAPPED_NODE) &&
1790 (ndlp->nlp_state != NLP_STE_MAPPED_NODE))) {
1791 atomic_inc(&tgtp->xmt_abort_rsp_error);
1792 lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_NVME_ABTS,
1793 "6160 Drop ABTS - wrong NDLP state x%x.\n",
1794 ndlp->nlp_state);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Potential Oops.
1795
1796 /* No failure to an ABTS request. */
1797 return 0;
1798 }
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [bug report] scsi: lpfc: NVME Initiator: Merge into FC discovery
@ 2017-05-03 21:21 Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-05-03 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jsmart2021; +Cc: linux-scsi
Hello James Smart,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch a0f2d3ef374f: "scsi: lpfc: NVME Initiator: Merge into FC
discovery" from Feb 12, 2017, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c:982 lpfc_cmpl_ct_cmd_gft_id()
error: we previously assumed 'ndlp' could be null (see line 966)
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
965 ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(vport, did);
966 if (ndlp) {
^^^^
Check.
967 /* The bitmask value for FCP and NVME FCP types is
968 * the same because they are 32 bits distant from
969 * each other in word0 and word0.
970 */
971 if (fc4_data_0 & LPFC_FC4_TYPE_BITMASK)
972 ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_FCP;
973 if (fc4_data_1 & LPFC_FC4_TYPE_BITMASK)
974 ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_NVME;
975 lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_ERR, LOG_DISCOVERY,
976 "3064 Setting ndlp %p, DID x%06x with "
977 "FC4 x%08x, Data: x%08x x%08x\n",
978 ndlp, did, ndlp->nlp_fc4_type,
979 FC_TYPE_FCP, FC_TYPE_NVME);
980 ndlp->nlp_prev_state = NLP_STE_REG_LOGIN_ISSUE;
981 }
982 lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp, NLP_STE_PRLI_ISSUE);
^^^^
Dereferenced inside the function call.
983 lpfc_issue_els_prli(vport, ndlp, 0);
984 } else
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-03 21:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-27 16:34 [bug report] scsi: lpfc: NVME Initiator: Merge into FC discovery Dan Carpenter
2017-03-04 17:48 ` James Smart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-03 21:21 Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox