public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
	Josh Poulson <jopoulso@microsoft.com>,
	v-adsuho@microsoft.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: SCSI regression in 4.11
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:48:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302094810.7487c235@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8ff2b64-2421-ca45-1f89-afec0490c8b3@suse.de>

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:25:14 +0100
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:

> On 03/02/2017 02:40 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 01:56:15 +0100
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >  
> >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:01:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:54:12AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
> >>>>> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/commitdiff/148cff67b401e2229c076c0ea418712654be77e4  
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears that is already in the code I am testing in linux-next...  
> >>>
> >>> It's in -next now, but it wasn't at the time you reported the bug.
> >>>
> >>> And it would sortof explain the bug if the INQUIRY data is correct
> >>> in the scatterlist, but we ignore it, given that scsi_probe_lun
> >>> ignores the result based on sense data.
> >>>
> >>> Can you check what happens with the horrible hack below:  
> >>
> >> Strike that - we're checking result later, so this can't be the case.
> >>
> >> Now the other interesting thing is the memset in __scsi_exectute,
> >> which looks very suspicious.  Try the following please:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> index 3e32dc954c3c..22f4fb550561 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
> >>  	 * and prevent security leaks by zeroing out the excess data.
> >>  	 */
> >>  	if (unlikely(rq->resid_len > 0 && rq->resid_len <= bufflen))
> >> -		memset(buffer + (bufflen - rq->resid_len), 0, rq->resid_len);
> >> +//		memset(buffer + (bufflen - rq->resid_len), 0, rq->resid_len);
> >> +		printk_ratelimited("%s: got resid %d\n", __func__, rq->resid_len);
> >>
> >>  	if (resid)
> >>  		*resid = rq->resid_len;  
> >
> >
> > Still fails but does print resid on some of the later INQUIRY commands (not the initial one).
> >  
> Can you test what happens if you blank out the storvsc_drv workaround:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 585e54f..c36f42d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -1060,13 +1060,13 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct 
> storvsc_device *stor_device,
>           * We do this so we can distinguish truly fatal failues
>           * (srb status == 0x4) and off-line the device in that case.
>           */
> -
> +#if 0
>          if ((stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == INQUIRY) ||
>             (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE)) {
>                  vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status = 0;
>                  vstor_packet->vm_srb.srb_status = SRB_STATUS_SUCCESS;
>          }
> -
> +#endif
> 
>          /* Copy over the status...etc */
>          stor_pkt->vm_srb.scsi_status = vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status;
> 
> It might thappen that we're fail to interpret the 'Device not present' 
> status correctly (which will happen for non-connected DVDs) causing the 
> SCSI stack to make incorrect decisions later on.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes

Makes no difference, that was one of the first things I tried (and just tried again).

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-27 23:30 SCSI regression in 4.11 Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28  1:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28  2:16   ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 14:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-28 15:32     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 17:06       ` James Bottomley
2017-02-28 17:16         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 17:31           ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 18:41         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 19:10           ` James Bottomley
2017-02-28 18:57         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 23:48           ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01  1:25             ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01  6:20               ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01  6:48                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 15:50                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-01 15:54                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02  0:01                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02  0:56                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02  1:40                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 13:25                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-02 17:48                               ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-03-02 18:23                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 18:36                                 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-02 19:05                                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 19:18                                     ` James Bottomley
2017-03-03 22:29                                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-04  0:50                                       ` [RFC] hv_storvsc: error handling Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-04 11:55                                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-04 21:03                                         ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-04 21:36                                           ` James Bottomley
2017-03-04 21:39                                             ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-04 23:55                                               ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-06 16:36                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-06 17:48                                             ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-06 17:57                                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-07  5:06                                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07  6:08                                                 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-02  0:57                         ` SCSI regression in 4.11 Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 16:13                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 18:48                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 18:57                   ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 19:20                     ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 19:39                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 21:27                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 23:09                         ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 23:39                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 19:00                   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-28 17:33     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170302094810.7487c235@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jopoulso@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=v-adsuho@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox