From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
Josh Poulson <jopoulso@microsoft.com>,
v-adsuho@microsoft.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: SCSI regression in 4.11
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:48:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302094810.7487c235@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8ff2b64-2421-ca45-1f89-afec0490c8b3@suse.de>
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:25:14 +0100
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 02:40 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 01:56:15 +0100
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:01:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:54:12AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>>>> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/commitdiff/148cff67b401e2229c076c0ea418712654be77e4
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears that is already in the code I am testing in linux-next...
> >>>
> >>> It's in -next now, but it wasn't at the time you reported the bug.
> >>>
> >>> And it would sortof explain the bug if the INQUIRY data is correct
> >>> in the scatterlist, but we ignore it, given that scsi_probe_lun
> >>> ignores the result based on sense data.
> >>>
> >>> Can you check what happens with the horrible hack below:
> >>
> >> Strike that - we're checking result later, so this can't be the case.
> >>
> >> Now the other interesting thing is the memset in __scsi_exectute,
> >> which looks very suspicious. Try the following please:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> index 3e32dc954c3c..22f4fb550561 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> >> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
> >> * and prevent security leaks by zeroing out the excess data.
> >> */
> >> if (unlikely(rq->resid_len > 0 && rq->resid_len <= bufflen))
> >> - memset(buffer + (bufflen - rq->resid_len), 0, rq->resid_len);
> >> +// memset(buffer + (bufflen - rq->resid_len), 0, rq->resid_len);
> >> + printk_ratelimited("%s: got resid %d\n", __func__, rq->resid_len);
> >>
> >> if (resid)
> >> *resid = rq->resid_len;
> >
> >
> > Still fails but does print resid on some of the later INQUIRY commands (not the initial one).
> >
> Can you test what happens if you blank out the storvsc_drv workaround:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 585e54f..c36f42d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -1060,13 +1060,13 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct
> storvsc_device *stor_device,
> * We do this so we can distinguish truly fatal failues
> * (srb status == 0x4) and off-line the device in that case.
> */
> -
> +#if 0
> if ((stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == INQUIRY) ||
> (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE)) {
> vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status = 0;
> vstor_packet->vm_srb.srb_status = SRB_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> }
> -
> +#endif
>
> /* Copy over the status...etc */
> stor_pkt->vm_srb.scsi_status = vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status;
>
> It might thappen that we're fail to interpret the 'Device not present'
> status correctly (which will happen for non-connected DVDs) causing the
> SCSI stack to make incorrect decisions later on.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
Makes no difference, that was one of the first things I tried (and just tried again).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-27 23:30 SCSI regression in 4.11 Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 1:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 2:16 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-28 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 17:06 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-28 17:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 17:31 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-28 18:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 19:10 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-28 18:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-28 23:48 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 1:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 6:20 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 6:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-01 15:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 0:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 0:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-02 1:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 13:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-02 17:48 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-03-02 18:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 18:36 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-02 19:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 19:18 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-03 22:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-04 0:50 ` [RFC] hv_storvsc: error handling Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-04 11:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-04 21:03 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-04 21:36 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-04 21:39 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-04 23:55 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-06 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-06 17:48 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-06 17:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-07 5:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07 6:08 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-03-02 0:57 ` SCSI regression in 4.11 Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 16:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 18:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 18:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 19:20 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 19:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 21:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 23:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-01 23:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-01 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-28 17:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302094810.7487c235@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jopoulso@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v-adsuho@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox