public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:22:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310102205.GA12421@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7177cebf-8a9b-10d4-e991-5e43f4303ffc@kernel.dk>

On Thu 09-03-17 09:41:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 03:16 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > this is a second revision of the series fixing the most urgent bugs that were
> > introduced by commit 165a5e22fafb "block: Move bdi_unregister() to
> > del_gendisk()" and by 0dba1314d4f8 "scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name
> > registration crashes".  In fact before these commits we had a different set of
> > problems in the code but they were less visible :).
> 
> It was rather urgent to get those fixes in, so I already sent them off.
> Not a huge deal, but it would be nice to add the atomic init fix as a
> separate patch later on.

OK, actually my followup fixes remove the counter completely so I guess we
can just leave it as is.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 10:16 [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: Allow bdi re-registration Jan Kara
2017-03-09 16:39   ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] bdi: Fix use-after-free in wb_congested_put() Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: Make del_gendisk() safer for disks without queues Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration crashes" Jan Kara
2017-03-09 16:41 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling Jens Axboe
2017-03-10 10:22   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-03-11 22:27     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170310102205.GA12421@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=arthur.marsh@internode.on.net \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox